|
|
x | |
Preface |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xiii | |
|
|
xvi | |
|
|
1 | (16) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
A short historical background to EMU |
|
|
4 | (4) |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Assumptions and levels of analysis |
|
|
11 | (3) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
Economic and Political Theories of Integration |
|
|
17 | (31) |
|
Economic rationale behind integration |
|
|
17 | (4) |
|
Theories of economic integration |
|
|
21 | (6) |
|
Political theories of integration |
|
|
27 | (11) |
|
Explanations of EMU -- a literature survey |
|
|
38 | (6) |
|
An eclectic theory of integration |
|
|
44 | (4) |
|
A History of European Monetary Integration |
|
|
48 | (28) |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
Between the Rome Treaty and the Hague Summit (1958--69) |
|
|
52 | (4) |
|
The Werner Report and its aftermath (1970--4) |
|
|
56 | (14) |
|
European monetary disillusion (1974--7) |
|
|
70 | (6) |
|
|
76 | (27) |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
The relaunching of EMU -- the Delors Report |
|
|
80 | (8) |
|
The intergovernmental conferences leading to the Maastricht Treaty |
|
|
88 | (4) |
|
Post Maastricht: a post-mortem? |
|
|
92 | (4) |
|
|
96 | (7) |
|
|
103 | (14) |
|
Qualitative and quantitative research |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Interviews: a way to answer certain questions |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
The method used for this research |
|
|
106 | (4) |
|
|
110 | (6) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Perceptions of Economic and Monetary Integration |
|
|
117 | (44) |
|
Question 1: History of EMU: why Werner/EMS were (not) desirable -- the interests of the organization at that time |
|
|
118 | (12) |
|
Question 2: Under which conditions is EMU desirable? Attitudes towards the Delors Report, `One Market, One Money' and the Maastricht Treaty |
|
|
130 | (16) |
|
Question 4: the future EMU and its effects |
|
|
146 | (12) |
|
Short summary of the main findings |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
Comparing Actors' Perceptions |
|
|
161 | (23) |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
|
164 | (3) |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
Conclusions -- the horizontal comparison |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
The vertical comparison -- comparing the actors within each country |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
173 | (4) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
|
181 | (3) |
|
|
184 | (30) |
|
Economic theories not persuasive |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Limits of neo-functionalism and intergovernmentalism for understanding EMU |
|
|
187 | (4) |
|
|
191 | (4) |
|
A critique of integration theory: the development of an eclectic theory |
|
|
195 | (4) |
|
Actors' perceptions of EMU |
|
|
199 | (5) |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
Applying the eclectic theory |
|
|
206 | (4) |
|
|
210 | (3) |
|
Recommendations for further research |
|
|
213 | (1) |
Notes |
|
214 | (14) |
References |
|
228 | (23) |
Subject Index |
|
251 | (8) |
Author Index |
|
259 | |